Categories
Law

In-text citations include. [UPSELL_BEGIN] digital_copies_of_sources_used = 0

In-text citations include.
[UPSELL_BEGIN]
digital_copies_of_sources_used = 0
plagiarism = 0
pref_writer = 0
urgent_writer_assign = 0
version = 4; Technical line. Don’t touch!
[UPSELL_END]

Categories
Law

[UPSELL_BEGIN] digital_copies_of_sources_used = 0 plagiarism = 0 pref_writer

[UPSELL_BEGIN]
digital_copies_of_sources_used = 0
plagiarism = 0
pref_writer = 0
urgent_writer_assign = 0
version = 4; Technical line. Don’t touch!
[UPSELL_END]

Categories
Law

Hello, Attached are the instructions for a final paper. This is a group assignm

Hello,
Attached are the instructions for a final paper. This is a group assignment; I have agreed to provide the first 3 pages following the attached instructions (Please review attachment).

conducting an environmental scanning project that will identify policy issues and role for a (Local Government)
*Define the problem – 2 pages double space
*Assemble Some Evidence – 1 page double space
[UPSELL_BEGIN]
digital_copies_of_sources_used = 0
plagiarism = 0
pref_writer = 0
urgent_writer_assign = 0
version = 4; Technical line. Don’t touch!
[UPSELL_END]

Categories
Law

Describe the positives and negatives of the approaches that were taken in each of the six articles.

Access the GCU e-library and locate six peer-reviewed articles on Police and Community Relations. You need to specifically research articles that assess a particular community relations program/policy. Access at least three databases for these articles. In a 1,500-2,000 word analysis (total word count for the assignment), do the following:
Summarize each article:
Give an overview of the Topic.
What methodology (approach to understanding the problem) was used?
What were the implications/conclusions?
Construct a comparative analysis of Police and Community Relations by:
Describe the positives and negatives of the approaches that were taken in each of the six articles.
Delineate the approaches you would have taken in each of these six situations.
NOTE: Be sure to cite each article as you are conducting your analysis of it. Defend your analyses with research.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Categories
Law

Discuss how recent legislation medicalizing and legalizing marijuana will impact these strategies.

The police use two primary strategies to reduce drug use: supply reduction and demand reduction. Discuss how recent legislation medicalizing and legalizing marijuana will impact these strategies.
Please make sure your initial post contains a minimum of 250 words and includes the appropriate citations and references. Thank you.

Categories
Law

Did your primary sources support or contradict your secondary sources?

* Double-spaced, 12-point font, (preferably Times New Roman).
* You must provide proper citations (Footnotes & Bibliography) using Chicago Writing Style.
Do NOT use first/third person pronouns; Me, My, or I/ We, or Our
• Do NOT use contractions: I’ve, don’t, doesn’t, etc.
Introduction:
You should have an Introduction in which you state your research question/ topic and develop your own thesis or argument based on your research.
(Answer/ address these without using first personal pronouns)
= Provide a strong central thesis or question that you are attempting to answer.
* Layout how you are going to present your information in the paper.
– Address how your topic is perceived or presented in a historical context.
Body:
(Answer/ address these without using personal pronouns)
Analyze your sources
* Summarize your findings
* Describe what your focus was and what you found. (Remember to do not use I)
” Discuss your sources and how you used them. *NOTE: This does not mean summarize each source.
Questions to keep in mind as you are writing:
* Whether or not you have focused on your secondary sources more than primary sources, or vice versa, and why?
• Was one source more valuable than the others? Did your primary sources support or contradict your secondary sources?
Conclusion:
(Answer/ address these without using personal pronouns)
o Re-evaluate your presentation and re-address your argument. Did you successfully prove what you presented?
• Where or how you could improve your research? Are there other sources you would like to address that you did not have access to? Or, other aspects that you think would be valuable to this discussion
Bibliography:
o You should have a total 10 sources (At least 5 primary and 5 secondary)
* Divide your Bibliography into Primary and Secondary Sources sections (you do not need the descriptions of the sources: for each source just the citation)
* Do Not list, use, or cite tertiary sources or unverifiable sources, i.e. History.com, Wikipedia, Khan Academy, Encyclopedia Britannica

Categories
Law

For the purposes of this week # 14 discussion post, respond to the following statement.

For the purposes of this Week # 14 Discussion Post, respond to the following statement. In your response, attempt to rid yourself of emotion(s) regarding the topic and attempt to speak factually. As we know, when speaking factually, we need facts, so consider using research to bolster your claims.
By the government allowing Minnesotan’s to carry guns on the street, through our “Conceal and Carry” laws, it has made the average Minnesotan less safe. In other words, more guns = more violence or at least more potential for violence. Agree or disagree? Defend your answer.

Categories
Law

How does the u.s.

How does the U.S. Constitution allow power between the federal and state governments? Use in text citation and reference the source.

Categories
Law

How would you decide when to involve law enforcement in a disciplinary incident?

In this discussion, you will discuss issues related to discipline in public education from the perspective of a school principal.
Create a 500-word post in which you cite at least four supporting resources and address the following questions:
1. First, select an actual school in the U.S. public education sector to use as the foundation for this activity. It can be a school at which you have been or are currently affiliated or one that you are familiar with through collateral work or research.
2. Then briefly describe the school and the students it serves.
3. Next, in your role as principal, identify the types of behaviors warranting discipline that you believe would most frequently occur at the school, and explain the rationale for each of your selections.
4.What procedural and substantive due process rights would a student have in a disciplinary proceeding for each of these offenses?
How would you decide when to involve law enforcement in a disciplinary incident?
How would you guard against racial, ethnic, gender, or socio-economic-based bias(es) in disciplining students?

Categories
Law

Why or why not?

Part 1:
<
<
You may have heard about the McDonald’s hot coffee case. This is a pretty misunderstood case that involves tort laws – both negligence and strict liability. Complete the following analyses after watching this video of what really happened in this case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCkL9UlmCOE
<
<
Analyze negligence:
<
<
What was McDonald’s duty to its customer?
<
Did McDonald’s breach this duty?
<
Did McDonald’s conduct cause the woman’s injuries?
<
Did the woman suffer actual damages?
<
What, if any, defenses does either party have?
<
Analyze strict liability:
<
<
Does strict liability apply here? Why or why not?
<
Would this be a manufacturing or design defect?
<
Does either party have any defenses?
<
If you were Ms. Liebeck’s attorney, which theory of tort liability (negligence or strict liability) would you advise her is her strongest argument? Why?
<
<

<
<
Part 2:
<
<
In January 2001 a New York man attended a family birthday party at a Benihana restaurant, where chefs, while cooking at the table, routinely throw pieces of food for diners to catch with their mouths. The New York man wrenched his neck while ducking a piece of flying shrimp, requiring treatment by several doctors. By that summer, doctors determined surgery was necessary to treat numbness in his arm. Five months after surgery, he checked into the hospital with a high fever and died. The family sued Benihana for $10 million in damages, claiming that the fever was the result of surgery, which in turn was the result of the chef’s actions in throwing food at diners.
<
Read this article discussing the outcome of the case: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/11245302/ns/us_news-weird_news/t/jury-tosses-flying-shrimp-death-claim/#.XOcQi7h7k2w
<
<
Analyze negligence in this case by answering the following questions:
<
<
What duties do both parties (Benihana and the customer) have in this situation?
<
Explain whether the parties breached their duties and why or why not.
<
Explain causation (actual cause and proximate cause) in this case.
<
What damages would be claimed in this type of case?
<
Discuss any defenses that might be available to both parties.
<
Do you believe that Benihana should be liable for the man’s death? Why or why not?